International Expectations And Dispositions 6. International Actor And Situation 7. International Sociocultural Space-Time 8. Interests, Capabilities, And Wills 9.
Latent International Conflict The Balancing Of Power Comparative Dynamics Of International Conflict If these needs are unsatisfied, and if there is an obvious enemy or oppressor to direct them towards, then warfare is almost inevitable.
However, it does show that any stable, lasting peace depends on creating societies with a richness of opportunity and variety that can meet human needs.
The fact that so many societies throughout the world fail to do this makes our future prospects of peace look very bleak. This article is more than 7 years old. Steve Taylor. Warfare provides people with a semblance of psychological positivity in oppressed societies where other outlets are lacking.
Topics First world war Opinion Psychology comment. Answer: It really depends what you mean by "solve". What is true is that periods of violent conflict can be followed by extended periods of peace. If the source of a conflict doesn't go away, however, there is every possibility that the conflict will erupt again, violently or otherwise.
As human technology has advanced and warfare has become increasingly destructive, there has been an increased urgency to resolve conflicts non-violently. Answer: The roots of the Napoleonic wars lie in the French Revolution. Napoleon seized power from the revolutionary government and attempted to stabilize a country that had suffered from years of chaos and excess. There were also numerous conflicts associated with the revolution and in an attempt to resolve these, Napoleon ended up fighting the other major European powers, especially the United Kingdom.
It's difficult to know exactly what Napoleon's original intentions were, but eventually, the wars became a struggle to be the dominant power in Europe. Answer: The different types of war include civil wars, revolutionary wars, wars to achieve economic gain or capture territory, wars of revenge, religious wars, nationalistic wars, defensive or preemptive wars. Answer: War is a state of armed conflict between two or more countries or groups within a country. Answer: Wars have numerous different purposes.
Certain types of war, for example, a "defensive" war, might be fought with the desired outcome being peace. However, most wars are fought with the intention of beating the enemy and effectively imposing peace on the victor's terms. Answer: Although wars are typically fought between two or more armies, that is not always the case. There are many historical examples of irregular fighters engaging in combat. In a revolutionary war, for instance, many combatants might not be part of an army, especially in the early stages.
Partisan and guerrilla forces can engage in warfare too, without necessarily belonging to a regular army. As technologies advance, wars can be fought increasingly with automated weaponry, such as drones and missiles, with less and less need for a traditional army. Cyber warfare is also on the rise. Answer: It depends on the political system that the leader operates in, but in most cases, the answer is yes. Answer: There are many potential reasons, including: competition over territory and resources, historical rivalries and grievances, and in self defense against an aggressor or a perceived potential aggressor.
Answer: Wars are usually destructive, causing loss of life and damage in many other ways. Many people consider wars to be ethically wrong and most people consider them to be deeply undesirable. However, wars can also sometimes be considered necessary as a last resort, where no other option seems realistic. Controversy often revolves around those that think a particular conflict to be justified and those that don't.
Answer: Wars don't usually come out of nowhere. They typically though not always begin with some sort of dispute which then turns violent. The mechanisms and developments that lead to war vary considerably, however, and are often complex, only understandable through the study and interpretation of human history.
Answer: A "buffer zone" in this context is a neutral area, the purpose of which is to keep apart hostile forces or nations. The Crusades actually fall under defensive wars. The primary goal was to curb Islamic raids on villages in eastern European towns.
Well written, easy to understand, and great examples, Very clear, understandable and to the point, which can be challenging to some that write about History! Thank you!! I've referred back to this website several times already!! The list goes on, but the objective is always the same As for the Iraqi Conflict being a "defensive" war, it was just the theft of oil.
Hi I'm a fifth grader and completely over 10 thank you. This info really helped me with my assignment! I think this is really good for note taking in a history class. But, it does not have direct definitions. Is it true that civil wars do not just happen but are preceded by multiple and varied signals? Also, why do people choose to go to war instead of taking other peaceful measures to resolve conflict?
While Buddhism is less associated with religious warfare than both polytheistic and monotheistic religions, some exceptions exist such as in southern Thailand where the killing of a Buddhist monk is considered such a sacrilege as to prompt a furious call for immediate killing of the murderer.
However, in an area such as that, the Buddhists have been the minority and fear for their lives from militant Muslims. As co-editor of the book, "Buddhist Warfare" he said that, "Buddhism differs in that the act of killing is less the focus than the 'intention' behind the killing" and "The first thing to remember is that people have a penchant for violence, it just so happens that every religion has people in it.
It appears to me that to classify a war as one type or another, one must evaluate objectives of both warring parties. For example the American Indians fought for food and water which required land. The English fought for resources, land, and economic gain. So the Indians fought for survival while the aggressor fought for economic gain, along with egocentric ideas regarding religion and culture. The Indians did not fight for land.
Most had no idea of the concept of owning land until the English introduced it. Wow this is very nice. U have expanded my research capacity. I have a lot to gain here. Thank you very much. Example B.?
War on Terror - Began in Afghanistan A commom mistake.
0コメント